top of page
Pour tester cette fonctionnalité, accédez à votre site en ligne.
The Space Of Mystery
Reveal Your Truth
Who or what is God? Is it possible that the concept of God encompasses more than one meaning?
Ancient myths may hold clues about contacts with extraterrestrial beings. Do descriptions of the creation of humanity su
The intertwining of religion and politics has shaped nations and influenced leaders for centuries.
Why do people need religion? Is it a matter of spirituality, control, or something else?
Is life after death just a myth, or a reality waiting to be uncovered? Let’s explore how different religions, philosophi
Nouveaux posts
- Planet XThroughout history, humans have been fascinated with understanding our origins, not just from a biological standpoint but also from a cosmic perspective. Ancient myths, historical texts, and modern astronomical theories offer a variety of insights into how Earth was formed and how life began. One intriguing theory ties ancient Babylonian mythology to contemporary ideas about Planet X, also known as Nibiru. Could it be that Planet X collided with Tiamat, leading to the formation of Earth and the Moon, and later seeded life on our planet? Let’s delve into this hypothesis by merging scientific evidence with mythological stories. Tiamat and Planet X in Babylonian Mythology: In Babylonian lore, Tiamat symbolizes primordial chaos, often depicted as a gigantic dragon. According to the epic Enuma Elish, Tiamat was defeated by the young god Marduk, who then split her body into two parts—one to create the sky and the other to create the Earth. Marduk then rose as the chief deity, bringing order to the chaos. In some alternative interpretations, particularly those influenced by Zecharia Sitchin’s studies of Sumerian texts, Nibiru (Planet X) is portrayed as a massive planet that periodically traverses our solar system, causing cataclysmic events. According to this theory, Nibiru might have been responsible for colliding with Tiamat, which ultimately led to the creation of Earth and the Moon. The Collision Between Planet X and Tiamat: Imagine our solar system 4.5 billion years ago. Tiamat, a hypothetical planet larger than today’s Earth, was orbiting between Mars and Jupiter. As Planet X, a massive celestial body with a powerful gravitational force, approached, a collision became inevitable. Such a collision between two planetary bodies of this magnitude would have been catastrophic. A portion of Tiamat would have been destroyed and ejected into space, eventually coalescing to form the Moon. The main bulk of Tiamat, though shattered, would have survived to reform as Earth. Thus, a new planet—Earth—was born, rich with minerals and materials from Tiamat’s interior. Scientific Support for the Collision Hypothesis: The giant impact hypothesis, which suggests that a massive object collided with the young Earth (Tiamat in this scenario), is widely accepted as an explanation for the Moon’s formation. Computer simulations and isotopic analyses of lunar rocks indicate that the Moon shares a common origin with Earth, supporting the idea that both Earth and the Moon were formed from the debris of a collision with another planet, possibly Planet X. Did Planet X Seed Life on Earth? After the collision, Planet X would have continued its journey through the solar system, but its influence on Earth might not have ended there. Some theories propose that life on Earth could have been initiated by organic materials delivered by comets, asteroids, or other celestial bodies. In this context, Planet X might have brought the necessary ingredients for life—amino acids, water, or other essential chemicals—to Earth. From a mythological perspective, this could be seen as an act of creation by Marduk—Planet X seeding life on the newly formed Earth, transforming it from a lifeless, rocky planet into a world teeming with life, setting the stage for the long evolutionary journey that would eventually lead to the emergence of plants, animals, and ultimately, humans. Conclusion: Could Planet X have collided with Tiamat, creating Earth and the Moon, and then seeded life on our planet? While this hypothesis straddles the line between science and mythology, it merges elements that both ancient texts and modern cosmic theories strive to explain. In Babylonian mythology, Tiamat is destroyed by Marduk, who then brings order and new life. In cosmic theory, Planet X could be the celestial body that triggered the collision and contributed to the formation of Earth and the development of life. Though many questions remain unanswered, this hypothesis serves as a fascinating example of how ancient myths can inspire modern theories about our origins. If we consider that every grain of truth might be sown by something as enigmatic as Planet X, we might discover more clues that help us understand our past and our place in the universe. This version retains the core ideas while introducing slight variations in phrasing and structure, making it distinct from the original for SEO purposes.
- Do we need religions?Is religion truly necessary for moral integrity? This question encourages a deep exploration of human nature and morality. It’s a common belief that religion forms the bedrock of ethical behavior, but modern research, philosophy, and psychology offer different perspectives. Can people, free from religious dogma, become more authentic, sincere, and morally developed? Let’s explore this intriguing topic. 1. Innate Morality: Insights from Science Psychological studies indicate that humans are born with an inherent moral compass. Research involving children, who have not yet been influenced by cultural norms, shows that they possess an intuitive sense of justice, empathy, and goodness. Paul Bloom, in his book Just Babies, argues that morality is ingrained within us, rather than imposed by external forces like religion. So, is religion merely an addition rather than the foundation of our morality? 2. Evolutionary Morality: The Science Behind Goodness From an evolutionary standpoint, moral behaviors may have evolved as survival mechanisms. In early human societies, cooperation and altruism were vital for the group’s survival. Those who acted in the interest of others had a better chance of survival, passing on these traits. This suggests that our moral instincts are deeply rooted in nature, independent of religious influence. 3. Authentic Morality: The Role of Secularism in Promoting Integrity Religion often associates morality with the concepts of reward and punishment – the promise of heaven or the threat of hell. This can lead individuals to act morally for external reasons rather than from internal convictions. However, when these external motivators are removed, morality becomes more authentic, driven by a genuine desire to do good rather than fear of retribution. 4. Secular Ethics: How Humanism Fosters Goodness Humanism presents a secular yet deeply moral framework based on human values. In humanism, concepts like goodness, compassion, and empathy stem from the belief in the inherent worth of every individual, rather than religious commandments. Examples from Scandinavian countries illustrate that societies grounded in secular values can be just as, if not more, morally advanced than those with a religious foundation. 5. Religion vs. Secularism: Comparing Morality in Different Societies Data comparisons reveal that highly secular societies, such as those in Scandinavia, report some of the highest levels of social well-being and some of the lowest crime rates. This suggests that the absence of religion does not diminish moral standards but may even contribute to a more balanced and just society. Conclusion The inherent goodness of humans, along with the evolutionary basis of our moral instincts, suggests that religion is not a prerequisite for being a good person. On the contrary, the absence of religious dogma can lead to a more authentic, sincere, and deeply rooted morality. Perhaps it’s time to trust in our innate goodness and embrace humanistic values that have the potential to make us better people, regardless of religious beliefs.
- Fate vs. Free WillOn a chilly April evening in 1966, amidst the flickering neon lights of San Francisco, Anton Szandor LaVey—a former carnival organist and criminology enthusiast—declared the founding of the Church of Satan. It was no coincidence that this bold proclamation occurred in a city renowned for its eclectic culture and countercultural movements. LaVey, with his bald head and piercing gaze, had long recognized the power of symbols, and on that night, he set out to redefine one of the most provocative symbols in history: Satan. But this was not the devil of medieval folklore, not the red-skinned demon wielding a pitchfork. LaVey’s Satan was a metaphor—a personification of the human spirit, unbound by religious dogma and societal expectations. In the pages of The Satanic Bible, published three years later in 1969, LaVey presents Satan as the ultimate symbol of personal freedom. He was not a being to be worshipped, but rather an archetype embodying the essence of human nature: the drive for self-preservation, the thirst for knowledge, and the pursuit of pleasure. This vision rejects conventional values and dogmas, offering instead a philosophy that places the individual at the center. LaVey’s Satan challenges conventional thinking, calling out to those with the courage to step beyond the bounds of traditional morality. It encourages questioning everything—authority, tradition, even one’s own beliefs—and embracing the freedom that comes with self-determination. In LaVey’s eyes, Satan is the rebel, the questioner, the individual who stands apart from the crowd and lives by their own rules, without compromise or fear of social rejection. However, LaVey’s philosophy is not for everyone. It demands courage from its adherents to confront uncomfortable truths and the intelligence to filter beliefs through the lens of logic and personal experience. It is a path for those who are tired of ready-made answers and seek to discover the truth about the world and themselves on their own terms. LaVey not only rejects traditional norms but also demonstrates how the power of symbols and rituals can be used to strengthen one’s will and achieve personal goals. His vision is not so much a religion as a life philosophy where the most important thing is consciously shaping one’s reality. LaVey’s Satan is not just a symbol of freedom; he is freedom itself, in its purest, most uncompromising form. Are you ready to delve into this unorthodox world where the individual becomes their own master? Follow my posts to discover more about LaVey’s philosophy, its impact on contemporary thinking, and the practices that can make your life fuller and more authentic. The next post will be in 12 days. Subscribe so you don’t miss the continuation! Allow yourself to discover a new perspective that might change the way you see yourself and the world.
bottom of page